From:
"Shane Wilson Sculpture" <shane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:25:06 -0700
Subject:
Cultural appropriation
I viewed the work in question, and, sorry to say, it does appear to be
influenced by northern indigenous art. Though I can certainly appreciate how
that might come as a hurtful comment from a jury of peers, they seem to have
spoken the truth. Sometimes processes that seem deliberately unfair are
really just doing the best job possible under difficult circumstances. I
have served on juries before and without exception it is not an easy
process. Always there are applications chosen and applications rejected -
and even though it is almost never personal, the applicants who are rejected
see it as a negative judgement. Canadian attitudes toward cultural
appropriation are a little more stringent than American - it is just not
done. The one exception might be to acknowledge the influence of indigenous
art in one's own - then the viewing public can appreciate the artist's
contribution to the form (much like Picasso with African art). The
difference between Picasso (African art) or Van Gogh (Japanese art) is that
they acknowledged their source.
- Follow-ups
- message 00045: Cultural appropriation - Bill Brayman (11 Jul 2001)
- References
- message 00043: Cultural appropriation - Susan (11 Jul 2001)
- Previous by Thread: message 00043: Cultural appropriation - Susan (11 Jul 2001)
- Next by Thread: message 00045: Cultural appropriation - Bill Brayman (11 Jul 2001)
- Previous by Date: message 00043: Cultural appropriation - Susan (11 Jul 2001)
- Next by Date: message 00045: Cultural appropriation - Bill Brayman (11 Jul 2001)
