From:
"Lesley Carruthers" <lesleyc118@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 09:34:03 -0000
Subject:
Gallery Partnerships
Hi Elaine
Whilst I agree with you in principle, I think there is a difference between
a gallery which 'represents' you, and a gallery which is showing your work
for a temporary period. In the latter instance, I would certainly never
undercut the gallery whilst my work was showing there, but once the display
is finished, the obligations on both sides become much less clear.
If I find that a customer comes to me having seen my work at the gallery,
and buys a different piece of work from one that was exhibited, then I would
be inclined to give the gallery say 10%, in recognition of the contact.
However if a customer comes to me direct who had had no contact with the
gallery, then I would not feel that I owed the gallery any obligation.
What do others feel about this?
Lesley C
- Follow-ups
- message 00322: Gallery Partnerships - Gueganne & Len (10 Feb 2003)
- message 00317: Gallery Partnerships - VenezianoJ (10 Feb 2003)
- References
- message 00311: pricing carvings - Elaine (08 Feb 2003)
- Previous by Thread: message 00311: pricing carvings - Elaine (08 Feb 2003)
- Next by Thread: message 00317: Gallery Partnerships - VenezianoJ (10 Feb 2003)
- Previous by Date: message 00315: introducing myself - Bruce R. Colbert - Bill Urmenyi (09 Feb 2003)
- Next by Date: message 00317: Gallery Partnerships - VenezianoJ (10 Feb 2003)
