From:
Feanor <feanaro@zzzzzzzzzzzzz>
Date:
Thu, 04 Dec 2003 12:44:10 -0500
Subject:
the stone that was rejected
Hello Tomas,
Could it be that the stone was rejected due to it's color. It
might not have had the appearance that the builder wanted, but this does
not take away from it's ability to be a cornerstone. Showing that some
(the builder) are concerned with appearances, but this means little when
compared to the other qualities.
Just my 2¢
Steve
- References
- message 00172: The Art of Stone Splitting - Book - ARCHIES914 (01 Dec 2003)
- message 00175: the stone that was rejected - Tomas Lipps (04 Dec 2003)
- Previous by Thread: message 00175: the stone that was rejected - Tomas Lipps (04 Dec 2003)
- Next by Thread: message 00177: the stone that was rejected - Kevin Austin (04 Dec 2003)
- Previous by Date: message 00175: the stone that was rejected - Tomas Lipps (04 Dec 2003)
- Next by Date: message 00177: the stone that was rejected - Kevin Austin (04 Dec 2003)
