From:
Norman Watts <Norman_Watts@zzzzzzz>
Date:
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:37:05 -0500
Subject:
the stone that was rejected
this interpretation seems very likely to me (though I am not very
conversant with the bible). was the "builder" referred to clearly not
God?
- Follow-ups
- message 00179: the stone that was rejected - Kevin Austin (04 Dec 2003)
- References
- message 00172: The Art of Stone Splitting - Book - ARCHIES914 (01 Dec 2003)
- message 00175: the stone that was rejected - Tomas Lipps (04 Dec 2003)
- message 00177: the stone that was rejected - Kevin Austin (04 Dec 2003)
- Previous by Thread: message 00177: the stone that was rejected - Kevin Austin (04 Dec 2003)
- Next by Thread: message 00179: the stone that was rejected - Kevin Austin (04 Dec 2003)
- Previous by Date: message 00177: the stone that was rejected - Kevin Austin (04 Dec 2003)
- Next by Date: message 00179: the stone that was rejected - Kevin Austin (04 Dec 2003)
