From:
"Andrei Stefanescu" <andrei_stefanescu@zzzzzz>
Date:
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:45:54 +0100
Subject:
carving question
Dear Clive,
I can only second Susan in admiring your sensitivity and dedication.
Incidentally I did just what you suggested, namely looking at Michelangelo's
marks at this web site, which I found quite astonishing:
http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/mich/, e.g. Matthew.
You will find there photographs of M's unfinished pieces which you cannot
see elsewhere, taken in a unique fashion.
Now you have made me SEE these pictures - your poetic analogy with drawing
is so suggestive.
I have done instinctively some other of the things you suggest. I did draw
my piece first, and it is drawable. I made a clay sketch of it and decided
about volumes and their relationships. I do not attempt to finish one area
before the other, and the problem I encountered is indeed that of joining
curved surfaces.
I suppose I kept making two mistakes: I didn't follow the curvature
insistently enough, and I DID NOT HAVE YOUR ANALOGY WITH DRAWING IN MIND.
I'd dare take your analogy a step further and aside: I'll try to think of
modelling with the chisel, rather than taking stuff away, going with the
shape as well, rather than just removing what's around it. This is a
question of inner attitude. The lack of it causes what seems a technical
problem - you are so right!
Thank you, Clive.
Andrei
-
- References
- message 00318: carving question - Clive Murray-White (21 Jan 2004)
- Previous by Thread: message 00318: carving question - Clive Murray-White (21 Jan 2004)
- Next by Thread: message 00319: Pneumatic tools killed thousands in Barre, VT - Elaine (22 Jan 2004)
- Previous by Date: message 00320: Introducing myself - diana miller (22 Jan 2004)
- Next by Date: message 00322: Suppliers for stone for letter carving - Jacques Lanteigne (22 Jan 2004)
