From:
"Ian Marr" <ianmarr@zzzzzzzzzzz>
Date:
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:41:18 +1100
Subject:
carving ethics +
Clarification: I meant in the previous message to say that Koons (not in
stone) & Finlay (often in stone) show quite different ways in which the
artist functions who conceives & commissions handmade objects in
contemporary art (to be made by others). The effects of these arrangements
seem very positive both for the working stonemason (work, kudos, even
learning), & the *(usually significant) artist, who is almost invariably the
senior partner .It becomes a bit problematic when the maker/carver does not
receive acknowledgement: it's a complex question. Anyway, I didn't mean to
suggest a negative contrast, only a comparison of approach. Ian
- References
- message 00216: carving ethics - Ian Marr (24 Feb 2004)
- Previous by Thread: message 00216: carving ethics - Ian Marr (24 Feb 2004)
- Next by Thread: message 00226: carving ethics - Don Dougan (25 Feb 2004)
- Previous by Date: message 00220: natural unfinished stone bases- how to finish and protect them - Stacy Shure (25 Feb 2004)
- Next by Date: message 00222: Blue stones - Ken Barnes (25 Feb 2004)
