From:
don dougan <dondougan@zzzzzzzz>
Date:
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:07:51 -0400
Subject:
Taxonomy of Stone Workers
Blimey;
For what it is worth, I think your original solution to 1st question is
ideal . . . leaving plenty of elbow-room (so-to-speak) in the categories
for all of us that can't be pinned-down to one method or product. Though
I do not share a studio with anyone else, I also think the 2nd question
solution or the two pages with possibly overlapping information is also a
good solution.
I can't think of anything I'd change, but perhaps someone else will have
further suggestions.
Thanks for all your work.
Don Dougan
http://www.dondougan.homestead.com/indexdd.html
Question #1: ". . . is there any other practical classification of
stone workers? My guess is that there isn't. I know there are different
stone skills and trades (sculpture, architectural carving,
letter-cutting, etc), but many (perhaps most) stone workers are versatile
and don't have narrow specialisms."
Question #2: " . . . studios and small businesses with more than one
person. Right now we have put them in two
categories
http://aboutstone.org/vl/Ateliers_and_Studios/
http://aboutstone.org/vl/Services/
but we don't know if that makes sense to stone insiders.
- Previous by Thread: message 00131: Taxonomy of Stone Workers - Stone List Admin (19 Oct 2004)
- Next by Thread: message 00132: Greetings from Toulouse - gary grossman (19 Oct 2004)
- Previous by Date: message 00136: Greetings from Toulouse - Simon Brown (19 Oct 2004)
- Next by Date: message 00138: metal inclusions - Norman Watts (19 Oct 2004)
