From:
Simon Brown <moonsong@zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz>
Date:
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:29:04 +0000 (UTC)
Subject:
Bush hammer or pneumatic point
Quoted text begins.http://trowandholden.com/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?p_id=68
End of quote.
Thanks, Bill- I hadn't seen this hammer before. Looks like a beauty, cheap too.
It would be useful for texturing a surface. I'm tempted to buy one to try it!
I still think that a hammer and punch would be more effective than the pneumatic
hammer for removing bulk material despite the pneumatic hammer's fast action.
I say this because it is easier to adjust the angle of the tool to suit the
amount of stone to be taken off, working under flakes and between crystals. A
pneumatic chisel fights against the compressive strength of the stone.
Simon
- References
- message 00160: Bush hammer or pneumatic point - Simon Brown (26 Oct 2004)
- message 00161: Bush hammer or pneumatic point - abknight (26 Oct 2004)
- Previous by Thread: message 00162: Bush hammer or pneumatic point - Disbrow Consulting (26 Oct 2004)
- Next by Thread: message 00164: Bush hammer or pneumatic point - abknight (26 Oct 2004)
- Previous by Date: message 00162: Bush hammer or pneumatic point - Disbrow Consulting (26 Oct 2004)
- Next by Date: message 00164: Bush hammer or pneumatic point - abknight (26 Oct 2004)
