From:
Nick Durnan <durnan@zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz>
Date:
Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:53:45 +0000
Subject:
mortar for limestone blocks
George
The masons I know who work like me on historic buildings prefer to bed
the stone on mortar rather than using spacers as this gives a more even
loading pressure between the blocks. Sometimes there is no option but
to use spacers, when building an arch on wooden centring for instance
to get even joint widths. But that said I have never seen any evidence
of spacers on any mediaeval work I have dismantled, on arches or
anywhere else. As for adhesive properties I feel that mortar is not for
adhering or glueing blocks together but rather as a material for
keeping then slightly apart, for filling joints and providing even
loadings between them.
Our regular mortar is pozzolanic putty lime mortar or slightly
hydraulic lime mortar as we have seen the damage caused by the use of
Portland cement mortars used by the Victorian and 20th century builders
especially for limestone.
Nick
On 6 Dec 2004, at 14:08, George Graham wrote:
Quoted text begins.Is it standard masonry practice to always use some sort of spacer for
the
joints between blocks of stone and then tuck point the mortar in?
End of quote.
Nicholas Durnan
Thrift House
Bow Street
Langport
Somerset TA10 9PS
Tel 01458 259094
http://www.nickdurnan.co.uk
- References
- message 00464: mortar for limestone blocks - George Graham (06 Dec 2004)
- Previous by Thread: message 00480: mortar for limestone blocks - Nick Durnan (07 Dec 2004)
- Next by Thread: message 00488: mortar for limestone blocks - George Graham (08 Dec 2004)
- Previous by Date: message 00478: shop plans - John VanCamp (07 Dec 2004)
- Next by Date: message 00480: mortar for limestone blocks - Nick Durnan (07 Dec 2004)
