From:
Pwwhitley@zzzzzzz
Date:
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 22:19:48 EST
Subject:
Soulless?
But Clive...Picasso did stay nailed. Not that Pollock was one-on-one the
greater artist...Police has no where near the depth of Picasso. I don't think
that's what the game is about...isn't it a generational thing, "the king must
die, long live the king?"
Being the height of fashion was important to Michelangelo, too.
I'm not suggesting that name recognition is what it's all about, but no one
would argue that it hurts the sale of work. The best jobs went to the
Pharoh's favorites.
Most of us, it appears, do the work we do because it pleases us to do it.
There are practical considerations in life that each of us deals with in
his/her own way...but the sculpture is done without compromise. Or with
compromise, if we choose to do it so. With stone tools. Or with CNC, if we choose to
do it so.
And the work carries with it its own intent, whether or not it coincides
with the its maker's intent. Certain works, like the Venus of Willendorf, will
always be great artworks whether or not we remember the artist or the
artist's intent.
Philip Whitley
- Follow-ups
- message 00009: Intent - Bob Hackett (04 Jan 2005)
- message 00008: base for sculptures - Norman Watts (04 Jan 2005)
- Previous by Thread: message 00004: Soulless? - Pwwhitley (04 Jan 2005)
- Next by Thread: message 00008: base for sculptures - Norman Watts (04 Jan 2005)
- Previous by Date: message 00005: Soulless? - Clive Murray-White (04 Jan 2005)
- Next by Date: message 00007: Soulless? - Pwwhitley (04 Jan 2005)
