From:
"StoneSpider" <ukstonespider@zzzzzzzzzzz>
Date:
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 10:43:18 -0000
Subject:
Bill +
Clive - you are quite right - the Sotomayor piece is schmaltz/soft porn - so
why didn't I say so at the time? Laziness principally but also because a)
if that's what the guy wants to carve and that's what the people love - so
be it and b) the piece was, I think, introduced to talk about technique not
content.
Cheers
Deb
- Follow-ups
- message 00125: Bill + - Dulce Maria Rico (16 Jan 2005)
- message 00123: Bill + - Norman Watts (16 Jan 2005)
- message 00121: American technique - Bob Hackett (16 Jan 2005)
- References
- message 00116: tool cases, boring Florida - r putnam (15 Jan 2005)
- message 00119: Bill + - Clive Murray-White (16 Jan 2005)
- Previous by Thread: message 00119: Bill + - Clive Murray-White (16 Jan 2005)
- Next by Thread: message 00121: American technique - Bob Hackett (16 Jan 2005)
- Previous by Date: message 00119: Bill + - Clive Murray-White (16 Jan 2005)
- Next by Date: message 00121: American technique - Bob Hackett (16 Jan 2005)
