From:
"John VanCamp" <jvcstnwrks@zzzzzzzzzzzzz>
Date:
Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:46:20 -0600
Subject:
getting the most from your stone
Quoted text begins.One piece started out as a limestone rectangle measuring 25x12x6 and
when the torso, Astre, was complete she still measured, at the
tallest, widest and thickest points 25x12x6. I do believe using a cut
shape, flat sides all around, allows you to be less 'wasteful'.....but
we don't always have that luxury.....
End of quote.
Total agreement with that from this carver. If one has a
definite form to carve-- be it sculptural or architectural,
starting with a cut stone that meets the dimensional needs is
the easiest and less wasteful approach. However, in my opinion,
beginning with an odd, or natural shaped stone, and letting the
stone itself direct the final form is much more exciting. The
mystery of not knowing the destination while on the journey if
you will.
John VanCamp / JVC Stoneworks
- References
- message 00524: getting the most from your stone - Robin Putnam (27 Feb 2005)
- Previous by Thread: message 00524: getting the most from your stone - Robin Putnam (27 Feb 2005)
- Next by Thread: message 00469: A wide open question! - Kathy Clegg (24 Feb 2005)
- Previous by Date: message 00524: getting the most from your stone - Robin Putnam (27 Feb 2005)
- Next by Date: message 00526: Working Large Blocks - Robin Putnam (27 Feb 2005)
