From:
VisualThinker7@zzzzzzz
Date:
Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:54:12 EST
Subject:
Pollock and fractals and book about recognizing artists
The book is: Master Pieces: The Curator's Game by Thomas Hoving
( former curator of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. )
Mr Hoving has been interviewed by a number of journalists in recent years,
both broadcast and print, talking very openly about various issues concerning
attribution of works of art.
On the radio here in NYC he said that the Met had purchased many works of
art which later turned out to be forgeries. These are hidden from view in the
vaults of the museum.
The Met has also accepted gifts of forged works which were purchased by
wealthy donors. The truth about these works was concealed from them, to avoid
humiliating them.
Why is this relevant here? Many fragments of 'ancient sculpture' are
forgeries. It's easier to copy an arm, or a head, than it is to make an entire work.
And museums WILL pay for fragments of statuary, when they'd never purchase a
piece of a painting.
- Follow-ups
- message 00380: Pollock and fractals and book about recognizing artists - Clive Murray-White (14 Feb 2006)
- Previous by Thread: message 00376: Pollock and fractals - Norman Watts (13 Feb 2006)
- Next by Thread: message 00380: Pollock and fractals and book about recognizing artists - Clive Murray-White (14 Feb 2006)
- Previous by Date: message 00378: Pollock and fractals - daedelus lanthanien (13 Feb 2006)
- Next by Date: message 00380: Pollock and fractals and book about recognizing artists - Clive Murray-White (14 Feb 2006)
