From:
sue <zdome@zzzzzzzz>
Date:
Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:42:08 -0700
Subject:
Pollock and fractals
Many years ago I had a person pick up a piece I had made a few years
prior and in a different place. We were having a discussion on the work
environment of our mutual employer, a scientific publisher. As that
discussion wound down he changed the topic and began to describe in
detail the scene several years before I had met him, and in another
place as it was when I was carving that piece he was holding. He could
'see?' 'feel?' 'know?' it as if he were there all by touching the
carving. He was accurate down to the design on my clothing, the quality
of sunlight coming in the window and the interuption to work that
happened one afternoon. Not sure how this connects to fractals other
than they are, a double helix that form which connects all things.
g'morning folks :)
s
Quoted text begins.Now sculpture doesn't have nearly as much time and detail
(and theory) to work with, but somehow it can speak, can't it?
n
End of quote.
- References
- message 00385: Pollock and fractals - Norman Watts (14 Feb 2006)
- Previous by Thread: message 00385: Pollock and fractals - Norman Watts (14 Feb 2006)
- Next by Thread: message 00382: Pollock and fractals - John Klassen (14 Feb 2006)
- Previous by Date: message 00390: Pollock and fractals - abknight (14 Feb 2006)
- Next by Date: message 00392: Pollock and fractals - artisti (14 Feb 2006)
